chore(qsl): align canonical research metadata - #32
Conversation
Co-Authored-By: Codex <noreply@openai.com>
|
Bugbot is not enabled for your account, so this pull request was not reviewed. Enable Bugbot in the Cursor dashboard to get automatic reviews on future PRs. |
![chatgpt-codex-connector[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1144995?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: ed8af7556b
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
| repo = "ResearchSignalContextPipelines" | ||
| tier = "research" | ||
| ring = 2 | ||
| tier = "pipeline" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The repository’s QSL architecture section still classifies this repo as research and documents the research-only boundary in README.md:4-10, but the machine-readable QSL metadata now publishes tier = "pipeline". Any QSL inventory/governance automation that reads qsl.toml will classify this repo differently from the documented boundary, so this research-only artifact producer can be grouped with pipeline consumers unless the tier remains research or the architecture docs are updated in the same change.
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
🤖 Codex PR ReviewPlease ensure a human reviewer checks this PR before merging. |
1 participant
Part of the QuantStrategyLab P0-P5 hardening and convergence wave.
Highlights:
Local validation was run before push in the Codex execution session.